Thursday, 19 April 2012 15:40

Samsung Repsonds to Apple's Patent Lawsuit with Claims of Their Own

Written by

Reading time is around minutes.

73Just when you thought it was safe to go back in the patent waters Samsung and Apple are back at it again. This is only days after the two company’s CEOs have agreed to sit down to try and work things out. We would love to be present for that meeting though. Still it does not look like these two mobile giants will be getting along anytime soon. What makes the situation even more interesting is that Samsung is a major supplier of parts for many of Apple’s products (and helped to make the SoC that is inside Apple’s iDevices).

So what are these two spoiled kids up to? Well Samsung is going after Apple for another handful of patents. According to FOSS patents this is in response to a suit that Apple brought against Samsung back in February. The response suit alleges that Apple is in violation of eight of Samsung’s patents 2 of which should be covered under FRAND licensing (Fair, Reasonable, and Non-Discriminatory) and they have been declared is essential . These last two could hurt Samsung, but we have to wonder here about something here. If you look at the many, many patent lawsuits that are currently open against Apple you might notice that there are a lot of complaints that Apple is not even paying FRAND rates for the use of essentials declared technology. In Germany Motorola Mobility filed a complaint stating that Apple refused to enter into a FRAND agreement with them and continued to use the patent after repeated requests for them to properly license it. HTC made a similar attempt after buying the patent portfolio from S3 (another company that had a long standing complaint against Apple). Even Apple’s attempt to prevent the sale of Kodak’s patent portfolio seems to indicate that Apple might know they are violating others’ patents.

Now we have Samsung looking to do the same thing with two of their essentials patents. It will probably not work for them as too many judges are willing to throw out patent violations claims when they are essentials. It would be nice to see a judge look at the bigger picture and see if there is merit in the claims that Apple abuses the essentials standard to use others patents without compensation while trying to patent items so broadly that they can still go after the competition if it heats up.

Discuss this in our Forum

Read 2033 times Last modified on Thursday, 19 April 2012 15:47

Leave a comment

Make sure you enter all the required information, indicated by an asterisk (*). HTML code is not allowed.